YODER BROS., INC.

v.

CALIFORNIA-FLORIDA PLANT CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (63 total)

• Quality Foods de Centro Am., S.A. v. Latin Am. Agribusiness Dev. Corp., S.A., 711 F.2d 989 (11th Cir. 1983)
  …ut a monopoly and a dangerous probability of success. Swift & Co. v. United States, 196 U.S. 375, 396, 25 S.Ct. 276, 279, 49 L.Ed. 518 (1905); Yoder Brothers, Inc. v. California-Florida Plant Corp., 537 F. 2d 1347, 1368 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1094, 97 S.Ct. 1108, 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977). Moreover, like the monopolization offense itself, the attempt must occur within a defined relevant market. Id.; see Walker Process Equipment, 382 U.S. at 177, 86 S.Ct. at 350. Plaintiffs ostensibly allege tha…
• Pan-Islamic Trade Corp. v. Exxon Corp., 632 F.2d 539 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …. 2d 1148, 1168 (5th Cir. 1979), other claims addressed, 607 F. 2d 167 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 101 S.Ct. 280, 65 L.Ed.2d-(1980); Yoder Bros., Inc. v. California — Florida Plant Corp., 537 F. 2d 1347, 1359 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1094, 97 S.Ct. 1108, 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977). Pan-Islamic, as indicated in both the original complaint and in the amended complaint, has no connection with the oil business other than its single contract with Sonatrach and its attempt to resell the Algeria…
• H & B Equip. Co., Inc. v. Int'l Harvester Co., 577 F.2d 239 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …polization, a plaintiff must show the defendant has achieved a monopoly, or, for attempt, demonstrate a “dangerous probability of success.” Yoder Bros., Inc. v. California-Florida Plant Corp., 537 F. 2d 1347, 1366-1369 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1094, 97 S.Ct. 1108, 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977). See Annot., 27 A.L.R.F. 762 at § 9. No hard and fast rule exists for determining the market share necessary to establish a monopoly. Compare Heatransfer Corp. v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G., 553 F. 2d 964, 981 (5th…

  ← 1 / 2 →