GILINSKY

v.

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (67 total)

• Kremer v. Chem. Constr. Corp., 456 U.S. 461 (U.S. 1982)
  …t of the evidence if the [NYHRD’s] determination is supported by substantial evidence,” State Division of Human Rights v. Columbia University, 39 N. Y. 2d 612, 616, 350 N. E. 2d 396, 398 (1976), cert. denied sub nom. Gilinsky v. Columbia University, 429 U. S. 1096 (1977). In affirming, the reviewing court finds only that the agency’s conclusion “was a reason [*492] able one and thus may not be set aside by the courts although a contrary decision may ‘have been reasonable and also sustainable.’” Imperial Diner…
• Pan-Islamic Trade Corp. v. Exxon Corp., 632 F.2d 539 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …of alleged attempt to monopolize telephone equipment market by phone company by below cost pricing, resulting in higher phone rates to subsidize loss); Southern Concrete Co. v. United States Steel Corp., 535 F. 2d 313 (5th Cir. 1976), ceri. denied, 429 U.S. 1096, 97 S.Ct. 1113, 51 L.Ed.2d 543 (1977) (manufacturer of ready-mix concrete has no standing to complain of alleged tying arrangement between seller of cement and a competitor in ready-mix concrete); Donovan Construction Co. of Minnesota v. Florida Tel…
• Southmark Props. & St. Charles Ave., Inc. v. The Charles House Corp., 742 F.2d 862 (5th Cir. 1984)
  …allowing Southmark to bid on its debt, would be effectively nullified. See Miller v. Meinhard-Commercial Corporation, 462 F. 2d 358 (5th Cir.1972); Samuel C. Ennis & Co., Inc. v. Woodmar Realty Co., 542 F. 2d 45, 48-49 (7th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1096, 97 S.Ct. 1112, 51 L.Ed.2d 543 (1977). Appellants insist that because they seek only monetary relief and do not challenge the transfer of title of The Charles House property to Southmark,8 their claim does [*869] not disturb the earlier judgment. T…