INCISO
v.
UNITED STATES
INCISO
UNITED STATES
429 U.S. 1099
Supreme Court of the United States (1977)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 84 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (82 total)
-
Proffitt v. Louie L. Wainwright, 685 F.2d 1227 (11th Cir. 1982)…deferred sentencing hearing); Polizzi v. United States, 550 F. 2d 1133, 1138 (9th Cir. 1976) (judge’s in camera questioning of jurors re possible improper influence); United States v. Mitchell, 540 F. 2d 1163, 1165 n.1 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1099, 97 S.Ct. 1119, 51 L.Ed.2d 547 (1977) (preliminary hearing). But cf. Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 790, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 1763, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973) (due process guarantees right of cross-examination in probation revocation hearing); Morrissey…
-
Watkins v. Sowders, 449 U.S. 341 (U.S. 1981)…iary hearing not required where no critical facts in dispute); United States v. Mitchell, 540 F. 2d 1163, 1166 (CA3 1976) (defendant could have “requested a hearing outside the presence of the jury in accordance with Neil v. Biggers”), cert. denied, 429 U. S. 1099 (1977); Nassar v. Vinzant, 519 F. 2d 798, 802, n. 4 (CA1) (commending hearing out of jury’s presence), cert, denied, 423 U. S. 898 (1975); United States v. Cranson, supra, at 125-126 (“evidentiary hearing outside the jury’s presence is required” upo…
-
United States v. Bohonus, 628 F.2d 1167 (9th Cir. 1980)…hat it can determine the sufficiency of the charge. Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749, 763, 768 n. 15, 771, 82 S.Ct. 1038, 1046, 1049, n. 15, 1051, 8 L.Ed.2d 240 (1962); United States v. Pheaster, 544 F. 2d 353, 360 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. den., 429 U.S. 1099, 97 S.Ct. 1118, 51 L.Ed.2d 546 (1977). To satisfy these requirements, the indictment must allege the elements of the offense charged and the facts which inform the defendant of the specific offense with which he is charged. Hamling v. United States,…
Previewing 3 of 82 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence