GRANT

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (70 total)

• United States v. Carson, 702 F.2d 351 (2d Cir. 1983)
  …one another for overall success.” United States v. Alessi, supra, 638 F. 2d at 473. The inference that there was one loose-knit conspiracy as alleged is justified. See United States v. Panebianco, 543 F. 2d 447, 452-53 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103, 97 S.Ct. 1128, 51 L.Ed.2d 533 (1977); United States v. Tramunti, 513 F. 2d 1087, 1106-07 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832, 96 S.Ct. 54, 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975); United States v. Sperling, 506 F. 2d 1323 (2d Cir.1974); United States v. Bynum, 485…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. LaGUARDIA, 774 F.2d 317 (8th Cir. 1985)
  …re any evidence that the weapons were used in such transactions. Section 924(c)(1) reaches the possession of a firearm which in any manner facilitates the execution of a felony. In United States v. Grant, 545 F. 2d 1309 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103, 97 S.Ct. 1130, 51 L.Ed.2d 554 (1977), a search of premises which defendant identified as his office and residence uncovered both cocaine and weapons. The court affirmed the conviction under section 924(c)(1), stating: “We hold that the evidence est…
• United States v. Stewart, 779 F.2d 538 (9th Cir. 1985)
  …prosecution under § 924(c)(1), recognizing “the utility of firearms in advancing criminal adventures in narcotics”); United States v. Grant, 545 F. 2d 1309, 1313 (2d Cir.1976) (judicial notice of use of firearms by narcotics dealers), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103, 97 S.Ct. 1130, 51 L.Ed.2d 554 (1977), and the known risks of conducting an illegal drug business, the jury could infer from all of the evidence that Stewart’s possession of the UZI outside his residence was intended to facilitate the drug operation…