GUNN, WARDEN

v.

SESSER

Citator

Cited By (98 total)

• Shriner v. State, 386 So. 2d 525 (Fla. 1980)
  …ed subjects.9 United States v. Vasquez, 476 F. 2d 730, 732-33 (5th Cir. 1973); accord, Smith v. United States, 505 F. 2d 824 (6th Cir. 1974); United States v. Matthews, 417 F.Supp. 813 (E.D.Pa.), aff’d., 547 F. 2d 1165 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1111, 97 S.Ct. 1148, 51 L.Ed.2d 565 (1977). Hence, appellant’s confession was properly admitted at trial. Appellant next asserts error in the admission of evidence relating to the 8 Days Inn robbery. He properly cites Williams v. State, 117 So. 2d 473…
• Dixon v. State, 72 So. 3d 171 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
  …mited subjects. United States v. Vasquez, 476 F. 2d 730, 732-33 (5th Cir.1973); accord, Smith v. United, States, 505 F. 2d 824 (6th Cir.1974); United States v. Matthews, 417 F.Supp. 813 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd., 547 F. 2d 1165 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1111, 97 S.Ct. 1148, 51 L.Ed.2d 565 (1977). Id. at 532 (footnote omitted). Hence, appellant’s confession was properly admitted at trial. Shriner implicitly recognized that a defendant can invoke the right to remain silent on specific subjects. Basic Fi…
• Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (U.S. 1979)
  …both the state and federal judiciaries. See injra, at 336-339. So far as I can determine, this standard first appeared in our jurisprudence in Mr. Justice Stewart’s opinion dissenting from the Court’s denial of certiorari in Freeman v. Zahradnick, 429 U. S. 1111, 1112, 1113, 1114, 1116. At that time, it gave the impression of being somewhat narrower than — if only because it was stated quite differently from — the test used by the Courts of Appeals in reviewing federal convictions on direct appeal. See Curl…

  ← 1 / 2 →