MINNESOTA PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP

v.

SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Nat'l Ass'n OF Metal Finishers v. Env't Prot. Agency, 719 F.2d 624 (3d Cir. 1983)
  …istical methodology to be used is best left to the sound discretion of the Administrator. See BASF Wyandotte Corp. v. Costle, 598 F. 2d 637, 655 (1st Cir.1979); American Petroleum Institute v. EPA, 540 F. 2d 1023, 1036 (10th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 922, 97 S.Ct. 1340, 51 L.Ed.2d 601 (1977); FMC Corp. v. Train, 539 F. 2d 973, 986 (4th Cir. 1976); American Meat Institute, 526 F. 2d at 457. 1. The Regression Analysis Ford first questions the Administrator’s method of calculating the long-term avera…
• United States v. Earth Scis., Inc., 599 F.2d 368 (10th Cir. 1979)
  …lative history is relevant for determining Congressional intent. In another context we have noted the legislative history behind the FWPCA “does not help us much.” American Petroleum Inst. v. EPA, 540 F. 2d 1023, 1027 (10th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 922, 97 S.Ct. 1340, 51 L.Ed.2d 601 (1977). But in our view the government has the better of the arguments on legislative history. We are impressed by the rejection of the proposed Hechler amendment on mine water wastes, as being based upon the view min…
• Am. Petroleum Inst. v. Env't Prot. Agency, 661 F.2d 340 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …he Agency’s action as “reasonable” and “within the performance of [its] functions.” 541 F. 2d at 1027. Accord, Appalachian II, supra. In American Petroleum Institute v. EPA, 540 F. 2d 1023 (10th Cir. 1976), cert. denied sub nom. Exxon Corp. v. EPA, 430 U.S. 922, 97 S.Ct. 1340, 51 L.Ed.2d 601 (1977), petitioners herein challenged EPA’s authority to promulgate effluent limitations by regulations. The Tenth Circuit, citing duPont II, concluded, “the promulgation of the limitations was a reasonable exercise of…