MCGRATH

v.

CALIFANO, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE

Citator

Cited By (32 total)

• Dupree v. State, 615 So. 2d 713 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
  …ce, and intimidate members of labor union, defendants not permitted to introduce evidence regarding two union members’ past threats and violence because defendants presented no defense or justification or excuse, such as self-defense), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 933, 97 S.Ct. 1555, 51 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977). Based upon the foregoing, we agree that the trial court properly excluded the proffered character evidence, because the defendant did not show how the victim’s character was pertinent, that is, he did not rely…
• United States v. McLERNON, 746 F.2d 1098 (6th Cir. 1984)
  …05, 39 L.Ed.2d 347 (1974). Our review of this record reveals that the district court did not prevent defense counsel from adequately cross-examining government witnesses. See, e.g., United States v. Fife, 573 F. 2d 369 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 933, 97 S.Ct. 1555, 51 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977). Counsel were permitted to challenge the credibility of government witnesses and the veracity of their testimony. The district court, we find, channeled and directed, but did not prevent, the confrontation by de…
• Skinner v. Cardwell, 564 F.2d 1381 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …may be of such minimal relevance that the trial court would be justified either in totally prohibiting cross-examination about them or in allowing only limited questioning. See United States v. Kelley, 545 F. 2d 619, 623 (8 Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 933, 97 S.Ct. 1555, 51 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977); United States v. Marshall, supra at 1361; United States v. Carrion, 463 F. 2d 704 (9 Cir. 1972); Enciso v. United States, supra. When, as in this case, the denied cross-examination relates to impeachment of a…