JAMES

v.

TENNYSON

Citator

Cited By

• McGEE v. State, 438 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
  …lful’ as when he receives and deliberately ignores a notice to appear.” United States v. Cohen, 450 F. 2d 1019, 1021 (5th Cir.1971); United States v. Bright, 541 F. 2d 471, 476 (5th Cir.1976), reh. denied, 544 F. 2d 518 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 935, 97 S.Ct. 1560, 51 L.Ed.2d 780; United States v. De-Pugh, 434 F. 2d 548 (8th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 978, 91 S.Ct. 1208, 28 L.Ed.2d 328. We believe the reasoning underlying that rule to be valid and agree that it should be applied to prose…
• Jeffers v. United States, 432 U.S. 137 (U.S. 1977)
  …s refusal to review the decision on certiorari, petitioner filed a motion under 28 U. S. C. § 2255 for postconviction relief. The District Court denied the motion, the Court of Appeals affirmed, 544 F. 2d 523, and this Court again denied certiorari. 430 U. S. 935 (1977). In his opposition to the Government’s motion for trial together, however, when he joined the argument that the jury would be confused by consolidation, petitioner apparently had argued in favor of construing the statutes to create separate…
• United States v. Cowart, 595 F.2d 1023 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …tantial evidence. United States v. Palacios, 556 F. 2d 1359, 1364 (5th Cir. 1977); United States v. Smith, 546 F. 2d 1275, 1283-84 & nn. 2, 3 (5th Cir. 1977); United States v. Bright, 541 F. 2d 471, 476 n. 5, 479 n. 11 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 935, 97 S.Ct. 1560, 51 L.Ed.2d 780 (1977). See generally Holland v. United States, 348 U.S. 121, 139-40, 75 S.Ct. 127, 137, 99 L.Ed. 150 (1954). . See Part 1, supra.…