FARRELL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Chrysler Corp. v. Spiro Pitsirelos, 689 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
  …arranty dispute and appeal process. These provisions, essentially, even the playing field. We also note that statutory mandated damage awards are not unique. See Harris v. Beneficial Fin. Co. of Jacksonville, 338 So. 2d 196 (Fla.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 950, 97 S.Ct. 1591, 51 L.Ed.2d 800 (1977). See also Ford Motor Co. v. Barrett, 115 Wash.2d 556, 800 P. 2d 367 (1990). We reject the argument that the statutory continuing damage assessment denies access to the courts by placing a financial obstacle i…
• THE Florida BAR v. Schreiber, 407 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 1981)
  …nia Pharmacy Board. Thus the social benefit from this method of commercial promotion is extremely marginal particularly when cast against possible harms to the recipient. See Harris v. Beneficial Finance Co., 338 So. 2d 196 (Fla.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 950, 97 S.Ct. 1591, 51 L.Ed.2d 800 (1977) (commercial speech with little public interest not constitutionally protected). II. Schreiber would have us characterize his letter as a permissible advertisement protected under the dictates of Bates v. State…
• Borell v. SCI Funeral Servs. OF Fla., Inc., 740 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Harris v. Beneficial Fin. Co. of Jacksonville, 338 So. 2d 196 (Fla.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 950, 97 S.Ct. 1591 (1977).…