MORRIS ET AL.

v.

GRESSETTE, PRESIDENT PRO TEM, SOUTH CAROLINA SENATE, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Adamo Wrecking Co. v. United States, 434 U.S. 275 (U.S. 1978)
  …sed, 545 F. 2d 1 (1976), holding that Congress had in § 307 (b) precluded petitioner from questioning in a criminal proceeding whether a regulation ostensibly promulgated under § 112 (b)(1)(B) was in fact an emission standard. We granted certiorari, 430 U. S. 953 (1977), and we now reverse. I We do not intend to make light of a difficult question of statutory interpretation when we say that the basic question in this case may be phrased: “When is an emission standard not an emission standard?” Petitioner c…
• Citizens TO Save Spencer Cnty. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 600 F.2d 844 (D.C. Cir. 1979)
  …the EPA in the Act to improve the nation’s air quality. See Sierra Club v. Environmental Protection Agency, supra. The Supreme Court granted petitions for certiorari on two issues raised by petitioners in that case. See Montana Power Company v. EPA, 430 U.S. 953, 97 S.Ct. 1597, 51 L.Ed.2d 802 (1977). After passage of the 1977 Amendments, however, the Supreme Court vacated this court’s decision upholding the promulgation and remanded the case for reconsideration in light of the 1977 Amendments. See Montana P…
• The Cleveland Elec. Illuminating Co. v. Env't Prot. Agency, 572 F.2d 1150 (6th Cir. 1978)
  …tive perfection. But it certainly tends to show that the EPA’s use of RAM, if conservative, cannot be held to be arbitrary and capricious. See Sierra Club v. EPA, 176 U.S. App.D.C. 335, 540 F. 2d 1114, 1136 (1976), cert. granted on different issues, 430 U.S. 953, 97 S.Ct. 1597, 51 L.Ed.2d 802 (1977). See also Mision Industrial, Inc. v. EPA, 547 F. 2d 123, 128-29 (1st Cir. 1976). We recognize that petitioners presented Enviroplan’s study on RAM predictions and [*1164] existing monitor results for the three…