ABBOTT

v.

THETFORD, JUDGE, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (69 total)

• Mason v. State, 489 So. 2d 734 (Fla. 1986)
  …ecord or recent examination of the appellant, and the chances are therefore decreased that such a nunc pro tunc evaluation will be unduly speculative. United States v. Makris, 398 F.Supp. 507 (S.D.Tex.1975), aff'd 535 F. 2d 899 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954, 97 S.Ct. 1598, 51 L.Ed.2d 803 (1977). We agree with the First District Court of Appeal’s observation in State v. Williams, 447 So. 2d 356 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), that no per se rule exists in Florida forbidding a nunc pro tunc competency determinatio…
• Holland v. State, 634 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
  …ir.1982); United States v. Nichelson, 550 F. 2d 502 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 998, 98 S.Ct. 640, 54 L.Ed.2d 494 (1977); United States v. Makris, 483 F. 2d 1082 (5th Cir.1973), appeal after remand, 535 F. 2d 899 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954, 97 S.Ct. 1598, 51 L.Ed.2d 803 (1977). Moreover, its availability has been recognized in Florida. See, e.g., Mason v. State, 489 So. 2d 734 (Fla.1986); State v. Williams, 447 So. 2d 356 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). There are no Florida decisions addressing…
• Givhan v. W. Line Consol. Sch. Dist., 439 U.S. 410 (U.S. 1979)
  …ionship between principal and teacher is significantly different from the relationship between the parties in Pickering3 as is evidenced by [*415] its reference to its own opinion in Abbott v. Thetford, 534 F. 2d 1101 (1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 430 U. S. 954 (1977). But we do not feel confident that the Court of Appeals’ decision would have been placed on that ground notwithstanding its view that the First Amendment does not require the same sort of Pickering balancing for the private expression of a pu…