FARMERS & TRADERS STATE BANK OF MEREDOSIA

v.

MAGILL

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Pepe, 747 F.2d 632 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …at § 3500(b). The purpose of the Jencks Act is twofold: to allow the defendant materials for impeachment and to protect government files from unwarranted disclosure. See United States v. Smaldone, 544 F. 2d 456, 460 (10th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 967, 97 S.Ct. 1648, 52 L.Ed.2d 358 (1977).35 Under the Act, the burden is on the defendant to show that the requested materials qualify as “statements” under 18 U.S.C. § 3500(e) and that they relate to the subject matter of the witness’ testimony. A tri…
• Retail Store Emps. Union, Local 1001, Retail Clerks Int'l Ass'n, AFL-CIO v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 627 F.2d 1133 (D.C. Cir. 1979)
  …S.App.D.C. 272, 277, 462 F. 2d 887, 892 (1972), quoting Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local 639, 158 N.L.R.B. 1281, 1286 (1966). See also Local 391, Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters v. NLRB, 178 U.S.App.D.C. 60, 63, 543 F. 2d 1373, 1376 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 967, 97 S.Ct. 1649, 52 L.Ed.2d 359 (1977). . The only activity over which Safeco exerts any sort of supervision is the issuance of title insurance commitments above specified dollar limits, and this is no more than a prudent and commonplace control ove…
• United States v. Woodruff, 596 F.2d 798 (8th Cir. 1979)
  …se was filed 17 days after the dismissal and thus was timely. This court has recognized the government’s right of appeal in a situation similar to that in the instant case. See United States v. Hemphill, 544 F. 2d 341 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 967, 97 S.Ct. 1648, 52 L.Ed.2d 358 (1977). In addition, we have recently explained that consistent with the changes in local rules effective September 1, 1975, “motions to dismiss on the ground of frivolity will no longer be entertained by this court.”…