HARBOLT

v.

MCCUNE, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (40 total)

• United States v. Ghassan L. Ammar, 714 F.2d 238 (3d Cir. 1983)
  …e [defendant] under the rule in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963) [requiring disclosure of exculpatory evidence] or the Jencks Act.” Accord United States v. Parker, 549 F. 2d 1217, 1223-25 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 971, 97 S.Ct. 1659, 52 L.Ed.2d 365 (1977); United States v. Harrison, 524 F. 2d 421, 428-29 (D.C.Cir.1975). But see United States v. Martin, 565 F. 2d 362, 363 (5th Cir.1978); United States v. McCallie, 554 F. 2d 770, 773 (6th Cir.1977). No question und…
• United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877 (9th Cir. 1981)
  …vation rule, there has been some basis for believing the destroyed material may have contained a more accurate account or recordation than the material eventually disclosed. See United States v. Parker, 549 F. 2d 1217, 1223 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 971, 97 S.Ct. 1659, 52 L.Ed.2d 365 (1977); United States v. Robinson, 546 F. 2d 309, 312 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 918, 97 S.Ct. 1333, 51 L.Ed.2d 596 (1977); United States v. Well, 572 F. 2d 1383, 1384 (9th Cir. 1978); United States v. Fin…
• United States v. Foster, 711 F.2d 871 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …support of that goal. Foster’s counsel objected to this line of argument. The prosecutor may well have exceeded the wide latitude permitted counsel in closing argument. See United States v. Parker, 549 F. 2d 1217,1222 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 971, 97 S.Ct. 1659, 52 L.Ed.2d 365 (1977). The next morning, however, defense counsel agreed to the prosecutor’s offer to correct any misconception. The prosecutor then told the jury that he was referring to the defendants only and did not mean to imply…