PERKY

v.

MULLIGAN, CHIEF PROBATION OFFICER FOR ESSEX COUNTY

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …t 1390. A prosecutor may not make an appeal to the jury that is “directed to passion or prejudice rather than to an understanding of the facts and of the law.” United States ex rel. Perry v. Mulligan, 544 F. 2d 674, 680 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 972, 97 S.Ct. 1659, 52 L.Ed.2d 365 (1977). However, “[u]nless calculated to inflame, an appeal to the jury to act as the conscience of the community is not impermissible ....” United States v. Lewis, 547 F. 2d 1030, 1037 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 4…
• Bisaccia v. The Attorney Gen. of the State of N.J., 623 F.2d 307 (3d Cir. 1980)
  …eprives a defendant of fundamental fairness in his criminal trial. Donnelly v. DeChristoforo, 416 U.S. 637, 642-43, 94 S.Ct. 1868, 1871, 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974); United States ex rel. Perry v. Mulligan, 544 F. 2d 674, 678 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 972, 97 S.Ct. 1659, 52 L.Ed.2d 365 (1977). We next consider whether use of the co-conspirator’s guilty plea rises to the level of constitutional proportions. If so, the appellant will have satisfied the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). It is well s…
• Swietlowich v. Cnty. OF Bucks & Twp. of Bristol & Harry Merker & Sgt. Stanley Martin & Sgt. Walter Hughes & Patrolman H. J. McDonough, 610 F.2d 1157 (3d Cir. 1979)
  …however, is another argument for the use of videotaping trial proceedings so that an appellate court can properly pass on a motion of this nature. See also United States ex rel. Perry v. Mulligan, 544 F. 2d 674, 679 n.3 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 972, 97 S.Ct. 1659, 52 L.Ed.2d 365 (1977).…