PIPER ET AL.
v.
CHRIS-CRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC.; FIRST BOSTON CORP. V. CHRIS-CRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC.; BANGOR PUNTA CORP. V. CHRIS-CRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC.; KILGORE V. UNITED STATES; SCHWARTZ V. UNITED STATES; COMPLETE AUTO TRANSIT, INC. V. BRADY, CHAIRMAN, MISSISSIPPI TAX COMMISSION; TULARE LAKE CANAL CO. ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; SALYER LAND CO. V. UNITED STATES; SHUEY V. UNITED STATES; STEWART V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; CAMELIA BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. V. FIDELITY MORTGAGE INVESTORS; VESCO & CO., INC. V. INTERNATIONAL CONTROLS CORP.; JAMES V. ILLINOIS, IN RE KRAFT; AFFLERBACH V. UNITED STATES; HAUGEN V. BRYAN; ROOTS V. WAINWRIGHT, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF OFFENDER REHABILITATION OF FLORIDA
PIPER ET AL.
CHRIS-CRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC.; FIRST BOSTON CORP. V. CHRIS-CRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC.; BANGOR PUNTA CORP. V. CHRIS-CRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC.; KILGORE V. UNITED STATES; SCHWARTZ V. UNITED STATES; COMPLETE AUTO TRANSIT, INC. V. BRADY, CHAIRMAN, MISSISSIPPI TAX COMMISSION; TULARE LAKE CANAL CO. ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; SALYER LAND CO. V. UNITED STATES; SHUEY V. UNITED STATES; STEWART V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; CAMELIA BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. V. FIDELITY MORTGAGE INVESTORS; VESCO & CO., INC. V. INTERNATIONAL CONTROLS CORP.; JAMES V. ILLINOIS, IN RE KRAFT; AFFLERBACH V. UNITED STATES; HAUGEN V. BRYAN; ROOTS V. WAINWRIGHT, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF OFFENDER REHABILITATION OF FLORIDA
430 U.S. 976
Supreme Court of the United States (1977)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Davis v. Fendler, 650 F.2d 1154 (9th Cir. 1981)…ra; United States v. Daley, 564 F. 2d 645 (CA2 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 933, 98 S.Ct. 1508, 55 L.Ed.2d 530 (1978); United States v. Schwartz, 535 F. 2d 160 (CA2 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 906, 97 S.Ct. 1175, 51 L.Ed.2d 581, rehearing denied, 430 U.S. 976, 97 S.Ct. 1669, 52 L.Ed.2d 371 (1977). We have examined the cases cited by appellant and they do not support his argument. The contention is meritless. B. Appellant argues that a remand is necessary because the district judge failed to hold a hea…
-
Roco Worldwide, Inc. v. Constellation Navigation, 660 F.2d 992 (4th Cir. 1981)…d here under the authority of Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66, 95 S.Ct. 2080, 45 L.Ed.2d 26 (1975), as amplified and explained in subsequent decisions, notably Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc., 430 U.S. 1, 97 S.Ct. 926, 51 L.Ed.2d 124 rehearing denied 430 U.S. 976, 97 S.Ct. 1668, 52 L.Ed.2d 371 (1977), Cannon v. University of Chicago, 441 U.S. 677, 99 S.Ct. 1946, 60 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), Touche Ross & Co. v. Redington, 442 U.S. 560, 99 S.Ct. 2479, 61 L.Ed.2d 82 (1979), Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. Le…
-
In re the complaint of Hellenic Lines, Ltd. v. Prudential Lines, Inc., 813 F.2d 634 (4th Cir. 1987)…law, Insurance Co. v. Piaggio, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 378, 21 L.Ed. 358 (1872); Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. v. Piper Aircraft Corp. 516 F. 2d 172 (2nd Cir.1975) (en banc), rev’d on other grounds, 430 U.S. 1, 97 S.Ct. 926, 51 L.Ed.2d 124, reh’g denied, 430 U.S. 976, 97 S.Ct. 1668, 52 L.Ed.2d 371 (1976); Felder v. United States, 543 F. 2d 657 (9th Cir.1976). Moreover, appellate courts are to employ the same standards of review in admiralty cases as in all other appeals. McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19,…