SUPER ATHLETICS CORP. ET AL.

v.

UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC SALES CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (40 total)

• Cazares v. The Church OF Scientology OF Cal., Inc., 429 So. 2d 348 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)
  …called” as a witness on behalf of his client. In Universal Athletic Sales Co. v. American Gym, Recreational & Athletic Equip. Corp., Inc., 546 F. 2d 530, 539 n. 21 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, Super Athletics Corp. v. Universal Athletic Sales Co., 430 U.S. 984, 97 S.Ct. 1681, 52 L.Ed.2d 378 (1977), the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit interpreted the phase “ought to be called on behalf of his client” as requiring the withdrawal of counsel only if he is an indispensable witness, that is, he must have…
• Calder Race Course, Inc. v. Gaitan, 393 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …i mutuel racing has been considerably regulated by the enactment of various portions of Chapter 550, Florida Statutes (1979). However, despite the existence of such regulations, it was held in Fulton v. Hecht, 545 F. 2d 540 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 984, 97 S.Ct. 1682, 52 L.Ed.2d 379 (1977), that its regulation was not so excessive so as to make the state a “partner” in greyhound racing for the purposes of the Fourteenth Amendment. See also, Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Company, 419 U.S. 345, 95…
• Schweiker v. Gray Panthers, 453 U.S. 34 (U.S. 1981)
  …ty Act is among the most intricate ever drafted by Congress. Its Byzantine construction, as Judge Friendly has observed, makes the Act “almost unintelligible to the uninitiated.” Friedman v. Berger, 547 F. 2d 724, 727, n. 7 (CA2 1976), cert, denied, 430 U. S. 984 (1977).14 Perhaps appreciating the complexity of what it had wrought, Congress conferred on the Secretary exceptionally broad authority to prescribe standards for applying certain sections of the Act. Batterton v. Francis, 432 U. S. 416, 425 (1977).…