WALTER HOLMES, PETITIONER, CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
PORT EVERGLADES TERMINAL COMPANY, INC., AMERICAN MUTUAL LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY, AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS, CROSS-PETITIONERS

Fla. | 1967-12-06
No. 36275
CALDWELL, C. J., DREW, THOR-NAL and ERVIN, JJ., and WHITE, Circuit Judge (Retired), concur.
204 So. 2d 513 Florida Supreme Court (1967)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court denied the claimant's petition for certiorari, finding the Full Commission's decision to reverse the deputy's award was not an error.


Facts & Procedural History

A deputy commissioner found a claimant permanently and totally disabled, but the Full Commission reversed and remanded for further hearings. The emplo…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on petition and cross-petition for writ of certiorari to review the order of the Florida Industrial Commission. The deputy refused a proffer of testimony by the employer a short time after the entry of his order of February 11, 1967 and found claimant to be permanently totally disabled. The Full Commission reversed, holding the finding of permanent total disability was not supported by the record, and remanded the cause to the deputy with directions to conduct a hearing or hearings and to take evidence and determine claimant’s present physical disability.

Claimant has petitioned this Court contending the Full Commission erred in reversing the deputy’s award. The employer-carrier by cross-petition assigned as error the failure of the deputy to receive additional proffered testimony that claimant has returned to full-time employment.

We have heard oral argument and examined the record and briefs. It is our conclusion the petition should be denied. This holding renders the cross-petition moot.

Petition for attorney’s fees is also denied.

It is so Ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., DREW, THOR-NAL and ERVIN, JJ., and WHITE, Circuit Judge (Retired), concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw