TYLER

v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

Citator

Cited By (25 total)

• Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 (U.S. 1978)
  …le did not' rationally identify those persons who were emotionally and culturally Santa Clarans, the court held that the tribe’s interest in the ordinance was not substantial enough to justify its discriminatory effect: Ibid. We granted certiorari, 431 U. S. 913 (1977), and we now reverse. II Indian tribes are “distinct, independent political communities, retaining their original natural rights” in matters of local self-government. Worcester v. Georgia, 6 Pet. 515, 559 (1832); see United States v. Mazurie…
• Regan v. Time, Inc., 468 U.S. 641 (U.S. 1984)
  …ions upheld by this Court in Kovacs v. Cooper, 336 U. S. 77 (1949), and the size and height limitations on outdoor signs upheld by other courts, Baldwin v. Redwood City, 540 F. 2d 1360, 1368-1369 (CA9 1976), cert. denied sub nom. Leipzig v. Baldwin, 431 U. S. 913 (1977); Temple Baptist Church, Inc. v. City of Albuquerque, 98 N. M. 138, 146, 646 P. 2d 565, 573 (1982); Krych v. Village of Burr Ridge, 111 Ill. App. 3d 461, 464-466, 444 N. E. 2d 229, 232-233 (1982). Therefore, the size and color limitations pass…
• N.A.A.C.P. v. City OF Richmond, 743 F.2d 1346 (9th Cir. 1984)
  …ichmond police within the previous three years. The NAACP has an active and continuing interest in the local racial problems which allegedly give rise to such incidents. See Baldwin v. Redwood City, 540 F. 2d 1360, 1365 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 913, 97 S.Ct. 2173, 53 L.Ed.2d 223 (1977). Furthermore, there is no reason to believe that Richmond will refrain from enforcing the parade ordinance in the future. See First National Bank of Boston, 435 U.S. at 775, 98 S.Ct. at 1415.6 The effect of the…