RUTH E. BERNSTEIN, APPELLANT,

v.

GOODBODY & COMPANY, A NEW YORK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Vanguard Ins. Co. v. Townsend, 544 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)
  …le of Civil Procedure 1.230 and case law which forbid another party’s inter [*1155] vention in a law suit unless it is in “subordination of” and “in recognition of” the propriety of the litigation in the main suit. See Oster v. Cay Construction Co., 204 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967); Riviera Club v. Belle Mead Development Corp., 141 Fla., 538, 194 So. 783 (1939). In this case, Vanguard’s attempt to determine whom among the defendants were its insureds, would inject new issues into the Townsend v. Perez, et a…
• Brickell BAY Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Forte, 410 So. 2d 522 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
  …lar Galleries, Inc., 328 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Blue Cross of Florida, Inc. v. O’Donnell, 230 So. 2d 706 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970); compare Faircloth v. Mr. Boston Distiller Corporation, 245 So. 2d 240 (Fla.1970); Oster v. Cay Construction Company, 204 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967) (mere indirect interest not sufficient for intervention); (2) as is evident from the assignment, the developers’ only real interest in the outcome of their action against Aetna is to recover damages sufficient to offset a judgmen…
• Bernstein v. Goodbody & Co., 210 So. 2d 866 (Fla. 1968)
  …Certiorari denied without opinion. 204 So. 2d 539.…

Authorities Cited

• Automatic Canteen Co. OF Am. v. Everette E. Butler, Jr., 177 So. 2d 712 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)