CRAWFORD

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (23 total)

• United States v. Bledsoe, 674 F.2d 647 (8th Cir. 1982)
  …l to sever simply because evidence against a defendant on one count is stronger than evidence against him on other joined counts. Cf. United States v. Jackson, 549 F. 2d 517, 525 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 985, 97 S.Ct. 1682, 52 L.Ed.2d 379, 431 U.S. 923, 97 S.Ct. 2195, 53 L.Ed.2d 236, 431 U.S. 968, 97 S.Ct. 2928, 53 L.Ed.2d 1064 (1977). But even if Phillips could show jury confusion, he could not prove that he was prejudiced thereby because the evidence against him on each count was overwhelming.…
• United States v. Bohr, 581 F.2d 1294 (8th Cir. 1978)
  …ed to a scheme very similar to the one charged and he positively identified Bohr. Furthermore, the Arkansas incident was reasonably close in time to the crime charged at trial. See United States v. Davis, 551 F. 2d 233, 234 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 923, 97 S.Ct. 2197, 53 L.Ed.2d 237 (1977); United States v. Clemons, 503 F. 2d 486, 489 (8th Cir. 1974). Thus, we find that the requirements of Rule 404(b) were met. Our task does not end here. Rule 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence6 allows the dist…
• United States v. Esau Jackson, 696 F.2d 578 (8th Cir. 1982)
  …The agreement need not be express or formal, and its existence may be inferred from the actions of the parties. United States v. Wrehe, 628 F. 2d 1079, 1082 (8th Cir.1980); United States v. Jackson, 549 F. 2d 517, 530-531 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 923, 97 S.Ct. 2195, 53 L.Ed.2d 236 (1977). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict,1 we find that no jury could reasonably conclude that Scroggins and Jackson were parties to a single overall agreement to commit acts of arson an…

  ← 1 / 2 →