CONTRERAS-PEREZ

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (27 total)

• Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (U.S. 1979)
  …d” if not within limited exceptions. §§ 60-40.2 (b) (1), 60-40.3. Manning tables are lists of job titles and of the number of people who perform each job. Compare Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Schlesinger, 542 F. 2d 1190 (CA4 1976), cert. denied, 431 U. S. 924 (1977), with Sears, Roebuck & Co. [*290] v. Eckerd, 575 F. 2d 1197 (CA7 1978); General Dynamics Corp. v. Marshall, 572 F. 2d 1211 (CA8 1978); Pennzoil Co. v. FPC, 534 F. 2d 627 (CA5 1976); Charles River Park “A,” Inc. v. Department of HUD, 171 U. S.…
• Mead Data Cent., Inc. v. United States Dep't of the Air Force, 566 F.2d 242 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
  …current record it does not qualify for exemption, and, if segregable, it must be disclosed. . See Hawkes v. IRS, 507 F. 2d 481, 484 (6th Cir. 1974). . See Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Schlesinger, 542 F. 2d 1190, 1197 (4th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 924, 97 S.Ct. 2199, 53 L.Ed.2d 239 (1977); Charles River Park “A”, Inc. v. Department of HUD, 171 U.S.App.D.C. 286, 292, 519 F. 2d 935, 941 (1975); Moore-McCor-mack, Inc. v. I.T.O. Corp., supra, 508 F. 2d at 950; S.Rep.No.93-854, 93d Cong., 2d Sess. 6 (…
• Romero-Barcelo v. Brown, 643 F.2d 835 (1st Cir. 1981)
  …Corp., 337 U.S. 682, 689, 69 S.Ct. 1457, 1461, 93 L.Ed. 1628 (1949). The federal mandate provided in 42 U.S.C. § 4903(b) constitutes such a limitation. See Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Schleslnger, 542 F. 2d 1190, 1214 (4th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 924, 97 S.Ct. 2199, 53 L.Ed.2d 239 (1977). . A determination of whether Puerto Rico’s nuisance statute constitutes a requirement under § 4 will also determine whether the district court had subject matter jurisdiction over this claim. This question of…