UNIROYAL, INC., ET AL.

v.

JAVELIN CORP.

Citator

Cited By (34 total)

• IIT v. Cornfeld, 619 F.2d 909 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …ess intended activity in the United States involving American securities to be exempt from the fraud provisions of the securities acts simply because the victims are not American citizens.”); SEC v. Kasser, 548 F. 2d 109, 116 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 938, 97 S.Ct. 2649, 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977) (anti-fraud provisions designed “to insure high standards of conduct in securities transactions within this country” as well as to protect domestic markets and investors). A similar analysis applies to the TCC…
• United States v. Milham, 590 F.2d 717 (8th Cir. 1979)
  …must make a showing of real prejudice by demonstrating that the jury was unable to compartmentalize the evidence as it related to her and her eodefendant, Merchant. United States v. Jackson, 549 F. 2d 517, 525 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 923, 431 U.S. 938, 97 S.Ct. 2195, 53 L.Ed.2d 236 (1977). Such a demonstration requires more than a mere showing of a better chance of acquittal at a separate trial. United States v. Anthony, 565 F. 2d 533, 538 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1079, 98 S.Ct. 12…
• Doca v. Marina Mercante Nicara-Guense, S.A., 634 F.2d 30 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …gence. The District Court also did not err in finding, alternatively, that Marina’s own negligence, in the circumstances of this case, was sufficient to preclude an indemnity claim. See Lopez v. Oldendorf, 545 F. 2d 836 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 938, 97 S.Ct. 2650, 53 L.Ed.2d 256 (1977); Hurdrich v. Eastmount Shipping Corp., 503 F. 2d 397 (2d Cir. 1974). Finally, the District Court was entitled to reject Pittston’s tort theory indemnity claim, apparently predicated on the contention that Marin…