COLE

v.

OHIO

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• Panter v. Marshall Field & Co., 646 F.2d 271 (7th Cir. 1981)
  …eld into all matters which would be totally collateral.” Questions of admissibility of evidence of prior acts are peculiarly within the province of the trial court. See, e. g., United States v. Czarnecki, 552 F. 2d 698, 702 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 939, 97 S.Ct. 2652, 53 L.Ed.2d 257 (1977). Particularly when admission of the challenged evidence is likely to be cumulative and confusing, we will not overturn the sound exercise of the trial court’s discretion. Furthermore, the plaintiff was not pr…
• United States v. Felino Rodriguez, 882 F.2d 1059 (6th Cir. 1989)
  …mitting evidence under Rule 404(b), and ... we may only reverse upon a finding of an abuse of that discretion.” United States v. Hamilton, 684 F. 2d 380, 384 (6th Cir.) (citing United States v. Czarnecki, 552 F. 2d 698, 702 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 939, 97 S.Ct. 2652, 53 L.Ed.2d 257 (1977)), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976, 103 S.Ct. 312, 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982). See also United States v. Hatfield, 815 F. 2d 1068, 1072 (6th Cir.1987). In admitting evidence under Rule 404(b), the court must determine whet…
• United States v. Acosta-Cazares, 878 F.2d 945 (6th Cir. 1989)
  …g only upon a finding of abuse of discretion. United States v. Hamilton, 684 F. 2d 380, 384 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976, 103 S.Ct. 312, 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982) (citing United States v. Czarnecki, 552 F. 2d 698, 702 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 939, 97 S.Ct. 2652, 53 L.Ed.2d 257 (1977)). “In determining the admissibility of bad acts evidence under Rule 404(b), a trial judge is accorded ‘broad discretion.’ ” United States v. Vance, 871 F. 2d 572, 576 (6th Cir.1989) (quoting United States v. Ebe…