PENNSYLVANIA TRANSFER COMPANY OF PHILADELPHIA, INC.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Teamsters Local 115 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 640 F.2d 392 (D.C. Cir. 1981)
  …e Decaturville Sportswear Co. v. N.L.R.B., 406 F. 2d 886, 889 (6th Cir. 1969). Some of these remedies are severe, but they are not new departures. See, e. g., Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers v. N.L.R.B., 547 F. 2d 575 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 966, 97 S.Ct. 2923, 53 L.Ed.2d 1062 (1977) (bulletin boards); Food Store Employees Local 347 v. N.L.R.B., 476 F. 2d 546 (D.C.Cir.1973), rev’d on other grounds, 417 U.S. 1, 94 S.Ct. 2074, 40 L.Ed.2d 612 (1974) (names and addresses); Montgomery Ward & Co.…
• Campbell Taggart, Inc. v. United States, 744 F.2d 442 (5th Cir. 1984)
  …tly, it has been held that a predominant business motive is insufficient to trigger ordinary asset treatment if a non-predominant, but substantial, investment motive was also at work. See W. W. Windle Co. v. Comm’r, 65 T.C. 694 (1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 966, 97 S.Ct. 2923, 53 L.Ed.2d 1062 (1977); Rev.Rul. 78-94, 1978-1 C.B. 58. Since this is a single-purpose case, we of course decline to consider the merits of these alternative tests. . We think the objective test we have outlined is sufficient to wee…