ALLEN

v.

SOUTH CAROLINA

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Wasserteil, 641 F.2d 704 (9th Cir. 1981)
  …*710] counter or explain the testimony presented or evidence introduced is not an infringement of the defendant’s Fifth Amendment privilege.” United States v. Dearden, 546 F. 2d 622, 625 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, sub nom. Goldstein v. United States, 432 U.S. 902, 98 S.Ct. 295, 54 L.Ed.2d 188 (1977). This argument was directed at the defense, and did not constitute an infringement on Appellants’ Fifth Amendment rights. V. Sufficiency of the Evidence Appellants Friedman and Camacho each allege that their co…
• Raleigh H. Allen, III v. United States, 606 F.2d 432 (4th Cir. 1979)
  …rvicemen who raised similar claims. The Supreme Court upheld that decision in United States v. Larinoff, 431 U.S. 864, 97 S.Ct. 2150, 53 L.Ed.2d 48 (1977). The Court granted certiorari, vacated our judgment, and directed us to reconsider Carini. See 432 U.S. 902, 97 S.Ct. 2944, 53 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1977). We then reinstated the judgment for the plaintiffs and remanded the case for determination of the bonus due each plaintiff. After the Supreme Court announced its decision in Larinoff, counsel for the Carini p…
• Cent. Ave. News, Inc. v. The City OF Minot, 651 F.2d 565 (8th Cir. 1981)
  …er extraordinary circumstances existed. The gravamen of bad faith prosecution is the lack of a reasonable expectation that valid convictions will result. Eagle Books, Inc. v. Reinhard, 418 F.Supp. 345, 351 (N.D. Ill. 1976), vacated on other grounds, 432 U.S. 902, 97 S.Ct. 2942, 53 L.Ed.2d 1073 (1977). Although appellant’s chances of success in state court may be tainted by a mere possibility of erroneous initial application of constitutional standards, there is no evidence to support appellant’s contention…