MILLIGAN

v.

STONE, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Burley Clifton Harryman v. Estelle, 616 F.2d 870 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …ndom presented by the prosecution at trial as the condom that had been tested positive for heroin. Pursuant to these identifications, the condom was admitted into evidence. . United States v. Grant, 549 F. 2d 942, 946 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 432 U.S. 908, 97 S.Ct. 2955, 53 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1978) (Miranda “only inhibits investigative interrogation related to the specific crime itself.”); United States ex rel. Hines v. LaVallee, 521 F. 2d 1109, 1112-13 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1090, 96 S.Ct…
• United States v. Rhodes, 779 F.2d 1019 (4th Cir. 1985)
  …seeks to suppress, we agree that Rhodes’ response was spontaneous and not the product of interrogation. Thus, we find that the statement was admissible and follow the reasoning of United States v. Grant, 549 F. 2d 942, 946 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 432 U.S. 908, 97 S.Ct. 2955, 53 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1977), where we stated that Miranda does not protect an accused “from a spontaneous admission made under circumstances not induced by the investigating officers or during a conversation not initiated by the officers.…
• Pollard v. Cockrell, 578 F.2d 1002 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …son may be bound by a judgment even though not a party if one of the parties to the suit is so closely aligned with his interests as to be his virtual representative”. Aerojet-General Corp. v. Askew, 511 F. 2d 710, 719 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 432 U.S. 908, 96 S.Ct. 210, 46 L.Ed.2d 137 (1975). In this case, the appellees argue, the instant plaintiffs and the Holt plaintiffs are massage parlor owners and masseuses having identical interests in a determination of the constitutionality of the ordinance.…