MONTANA POWER CO. ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ET AL.; AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE ET AL. V. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ET AL.; INDIANA-KENTUCKY ELECTRIC CORP. ET AL. V. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ET AL.; ALABAMA POWER CO. ET AL. V. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ET AL.; UTAH POWER & LIGHT CO. ET AL. V. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ET AL.; AND WESTERN ENERGY SUPPLY & TRANSMISSION ASSOCIATES ET AL. V. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ET AL.
MONTANA POWER CO. ET AL.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ET AL.; AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE ET AL. V. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ET AL.; INDIANA-KENTUCKY ELECTRIC CORP. ET AL. V. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ET AL.; ALABAMA POWER CO. ET AL. V. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ET AL.; UTAH POWER & LIGHT CO. ET AL. V. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ET AL.; AND WESTERN ENERGY SUPPLY & TRANSMISSION ASSOCIATES ET AL. V. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ET AL.
434 U.S. 809
Supreme Court of the United States (1977)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 20 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ala. Power Co. v. Costle, 636 F.2d 323 (D.C. Cir. 1979)…times. . Technical Support Document, supra note 16, at 29-30, J.A. at 241-42. . Id. . 40 C.F.R. § 52.21(d)(2)(ii) (1977) (superseded). . Sierra Club v. EPA, 176 U.S.App.D.C. 335, 540 F. 2d 1114 (1976), vacated sub nom. Montana Power Co. v. EPA, 434 U.S. 809, 98 S.Ct. 40, 54 L.Ed.2d 66 (1977). . Pub.L.No. 95-95, 91 Stat. 685, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. (1978). . 42 U.S.C. § 7471 (1978). . C.A.A. § 171(2), 42 U.S.C. § 7501(2) (1978) provides: The term ‘nonattainment area’ means, for any air pollutant a…1 / 2
-
Citizens TO Save Spencer Cnty. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 600 F.2d 844 (D.C. Cir. 1979)…U.S. 541, 93 S.Ct. 2770, 37 L.Ed.2d 140 (1973). See also Sierra Club v. EPA, 176 U.S.App.D.C. 335, 540 F. 2d 1114 (1976), vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 sub nom. Montana Power Co., v. EPA, 434 U.S. 809, 98 S.Ct. 42, 54 L.Ed.2d 66 (1977). . 40 C.F.R. § 52.21(d)(1) (1975). . 40 C.F.R. § 52.21(b)(7) (1975). . S. Rep. No. 127, 95th Cong., 1st Sess. 33 (1977). . S. 252, 95th Cong., 1st Sess. § 6 (1977) (adding § 110(g)(6)(C) to the Clean Air Act).…1 / 2
-
Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. Costle, 657 F.2d 275 (D.C. Cir. 1981)…o. v. Costle, 191 U.S.App.D.C. 309, 590 F. 2d 1011, 1024 (1978); Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, supra, 541 F. 2d at 33-34; Sierra Club v. EPA, 176 U.S.App.D.C. 335, 540 F. 2d 1114, 1123-24 (1976), vacated and remanded sub nom., Montana Power Co. v. U.S.E.P.A., 434 U.S. 809, 98 S.Ct. 40, 54 L.Ed.2d 66 (1977). . The burden of overcoming this presumption is upon the party challenging the agency action. Mt. Airy Refíning Co. v. Schlesinger, 481 F.Supp. 257, 264 (D.D.C.1979), citing Udall v. Washington, Virginia & Marylan…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence