SWOAP, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF BENEFIT PAYMENTS OF CALIFORNIA
v.
GARCIA ET AL.; INDIANA V. SCOTTSDALE MALL; GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP. V. BULLOCK, COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS OF TEXAS, ET AL.; BERRY ET AL. V. DOLES, CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF ROADS AND REVENUES OF PEACH COUNTY, ET AL.; RANDLE ET AL. V. BEAL, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.; ALLIED CHEMICAL CORP. V. WHITE ET AL. WASHINGTON ET AL. V. CONFEDERATED BANDS AND TRIBES OF THE YAKIMA INDIAN NATION
SWOAP, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF BENEFIT PAYMENTS OF CALIFORNIA
GARCIA ET AL.; INDIANA V. SCOTTSDALE MALL; GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP. V. BULLOCK, COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS OF TEXAS, ET AL.; BERRY ET AL. V. DOLES, CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF ROADS AND REVENUES OF PEACH COUNTY, ET AL.; RANDLE ET AL. V. BEAL, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.; ALLIED CHEMICAL CORP. V. WHITE ET AL. WASHINGTON ET AL. V. CONFEDERATED BANDS AND TRIBES OF THE YAKIMA INDIAN NATION
434 U.S. 811
Supreme Court of the United States (1977)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Feminist Women's Health Ctr., Inc. v. Mahmood Mohammad, 586 F.2d 530 (5th Cir. 1978)…te governmental entity are immune from antitrust challenge to the extent that they are “comprehended within the powers granted to it by the Legislature”. City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., 5 Cir. 1976, 532 F. 2d 431, 434, aff’d, 1978, 434 U.S. 811, 98 S.Ct. 1123, [*550] 55 L.Ed.2d 364. A plurality of the Supreme Court expressly approved the state action test that we set forth in City of Lafayette. City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., 1978, 98 S.Ct. 1123, 1137-38; see also Bates v…1 / 2
-
Beulah Chase v. McMASTERS, 573 F.2d 1011 (8th Cir. 1978)…the action is not racial discrimination. See Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Corp., 429 U.S. 252, 97 S.Ct. 555, 50 L.Ed.2d 450 (1977); Confed. Bands & Tribes, Etc. v. State of Wash., 552 F. 2d 1332, 1334-1335 (9th Cir. 1977), appeal filed, 434 U.S. 811, 98 S.Ct. 48, 54 L.Ed.2d 69 (1977). Because the record demonstrates that New Town’s action was aimed at preserving its fiscal integrity and it was apparently willing to serve Chase if she paid local taxes, its conduct did not violate her right to…