FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

v.

NATIONAL CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR BROADCASTING ET AL.; CHANNEL TWO TELEVISION CO. ET AL. V. NATIONAL CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR BROADCASTING ET AL.; NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS V. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET AL.; AMERICAN NEWSPAPER PUBLISHERS ASSN. V. NATIONAL CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR BROADCASTING ET AL.; ILLINOIS BROADCASTING CO., INC., ET AL. V. NATIONAL CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR BROADCASTING ET AL.; AND POST CO. ET AL. V. NATIONAL CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR BROADCASTING ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Stump v. Sparkman et vir, 435 U.S. 349 (U.S. 1978)
  …mages liability under the controlling authorities. The Court of Appeals also held that the judge had forfeited his immunity “because of his failure to comply with elementary principles of procedural due process.” Id., at 176. We granted certiorari, 434 U. S. 815 (1977), to consider the correctness of this ruling. We reverse. II The governing principle of law is well established and is not questioned by the parties. As early as 1872, the Court recognized that it was “a general principle of the highest impo…
• United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 438 U.S. 422 (U.S. 1978)
  …majority. Neither of the alleged infirmities in the general conspiracy instructions, in his view, afforded any basis for reversal, and he disagreed with the characterization of the trial judge’s conduct as coercing a verdict. We granted certiorari, 434 U. S. 815 (1977), and we affirm. II We turn first to consider the jury instructions regarding the elements of the price-fixing offense charged in the indictment. Although the trial judge’s instructions on the price-fixing issue are not without ambiguity, it…
• Nat'l Soc'y of Prof'l Eng'rs v. United States, 435 U.S. 679 (U.S. 1978)
  …ould produce the dire consequences foreseen by the association.1 The Court of Appeals affirmed.2 We granted certiorari to decide whether the District Court should have considered the factual basis for the proffered justification before rejecting it. 434 U. S. 815. Because we are satisfied that the asserted defense rests on a fundamental misunderstanding of the Rule of Reason frequently applied in antitrust litigation, we affirm. I Engineering is an important and learned profession. There are over 750,000 g…