PRYOR

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (58 total)

• Merrill Lynch v. Melamed, 453 So. 2d 858 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
  …come of arbitration on the other claims. We order the stay because it appears that the federal claim is factually, although not legally, dependent on Melamed’s common law claim.7 Cf. Sibley v. Tandy Corp., 543 F. 2d 540 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824, 98 S.Ct. 71, 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977); Sabates v. International Medical Centers, Inc., supra, 450 So. 2d at 516. APPLICABILITY OF THE FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT The trial court clearly departed from essential requirements of law in concluding that Merri…
• Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. Byrd, 470 U.S. 213 (U.S. 1985)
  …ch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Moore, 590 F. 2d 823, 827-829 (CA10 1978); Weissbuch v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 558 F. 2d 831, 833-835 (CA7 1977); Sibley v. Tandy Corp., 543 F. 2d 540, 543, and n. 3 (CA5 1976), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 824 (1977); see also Brief for Petitioner 4, n. 3 (citing cases); Brief for Securities Industry Association, Inc., et al. as Amici Curiae 10, n. 7 (same). Dean Witter and amici representing the securities industry urge us to resolve the applicability o…
• Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMAHON, 482 U.S. 220 (U.S. 1987)
  …ch v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 558 F. 2d 831, 833-836 (CA7 1977); Allegaert v. Perot, 548 F. 2d 432, 437-438 (CA2), cert. denied, 432 U. S. 910 (1977); Sibley v. Tandy Corp., 543 F. 2d 540, 543, and n. 3 (CA5 1976), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 824 (1977); Ayres v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 538 F. 2d 532, 536-537 (CA3), cert. denied, 429 U. S. 1010 (1976). Although in his concurrence, Justice White observed that the application of Wilko to § 10(b) claims was a “matter of su…