ARIZONA STATE DENTAL ASSN. ET AL.

v.

BODDICKER ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (72 total)

• Robert E. Hackett, M.D. & Robert E. Hackett, M.D., P.A. v. Metro. Gen. Hosp., 465 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
  …believe antitrust per se concepts of liability should not apply to the case at hand. See Pontius, 552 F.Supp. at 1369-70; McElhinney, 549 F.Supp. at 132. Cf. Boddicker v. Arizona State Dental Association, 549 F. 2d 626, 632 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 825, 98 S.Ct. 73, 54 L.Ed.2d 83 (1977). Plaintiff does not contend otherwise and limits his argument to the rule of reason. The ethical norms of physicians, rather than relatively fixed rules of law, should be the principal influence upon decision-maki…
• United States v. Kenny, 645 F.2d 1323 (9th Cir. 1981)
  …d States, 435 U.S. 944, 98 S.Ct. 1526, 55 L.Ed.2d 541 (1978). That indictment is normally prepared by the prosecutor, who is presumably acquainted with the “applicable law.” See United States v. Chanen, 549 F. 2d 1306, 1312 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 825, 98 S.Ct. 72, 54 L.Ed.2d 83 (1977). We are not persuaded that the Constitution imposes the additional requirement that grand jurors receive legal instructions. Furthermore, the giving of such instructions portends protracted review of their adequac…
• United States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 (U.S. 1992)
  …d in the first three Articles. It “ ‘is a constitutional fixture in its own right.’” United States v. Chanen, 549 F. 2d 1306, 1312 (CA9) (quoting Nixon v. Sirica, 159 U. S. App. D. C. 58, 70, n. 54, 487 F. 2d 700, 712, n. 54 (1973)), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 825 (1977). In fact the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional Government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people. See Stirone v. United States, 361 U. S. 212, 218 (1960)…