LEROY KENDRICK, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
LEROY KENDRICK, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
204 So. 2d 903
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1967)
Caution
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.
WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K. and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hartman Auto Sales, Inc. v. Jaye, 214 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968)…ent that the vehicle was not a necessary as to this plaintiff inasmuch as at the time he possessed other means of transportation. It is contended by appellant that this case is controlled by the principles enunciated in Rose v. Sheehan Buick, Inc., 204 So. 2d 903 (Fla.App.3d, 1967). However, the case sub judice is clearly distinguishable from Rose, supra, for the reason that the trial court there found that the vendor had been led into believing that the purchaser was of legal age; and, further, that the car…
-
Leigh v. CAR Circus, 35 Fla. Supp. 69 (Broward Cty. Cir. Ct. 1970)…le announced in the above case does not appear to have been changed in this state. [*71] The court has also examined Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Conley, Fla., 152 So. 2d 521, citing Putnal v. Walker, supra; Rose v. Sheehan Buick, Inc., Fla., 204 So. 2d 903, in which there was a finding that the minor’s car was a necessity for him; Hartman Auto Sales, Inc. v. Jaye, Fla., 214 So. 2d 97; 17 Fla. Jur., Infants §17 et seq.; 42 Am. Jur. 2d, Infants §104; 12 ALR3d Infant-Sale-Use or Depreciation, p. 1178 II…