JAMES LEE CRUMMIE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JAMES LEE CRUMMIE, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
204 So. 2d 913
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1967)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 59 cases
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment and sentence imposed upon him pursuant to a non-jury trial and his conviction of the crime of robbery. Defendant’s sole point on appeal is whether the trial judge’s verdict finding the defendant guilty of the crime of robbery is supported by sufficient competent evidence.
We have carefully reviewed the record, considered the oral arguments and briefs of the parties and concluded that no reversible error has been made to appear. See Wright v. State, Fla.App.1966, 182 So. 2d 264; Solomon v. State, Fla.App.1962, 145 So.2d 492.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (29 total)
-
Nelson v. State, 274 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973)…nues to demand a dismissal of his court appointed counsel, the trial judge may in his discretion discharge counsel and require the defendant to proceed to trial without representation by court appointed counsel. See Cappetta v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 204 So. 2d 913 for principles that should guide the court in the exercise of such discretion. If the foregoing procedure is followed, the indigent’s right to counsel will be protected and a sufficient record will be made to permit a prompt and accurate dispositio…
-
State v. Cappetta, 216 So. 2d 749 (Fla. 1968)…HOPPING, Justice. The State of Florida, by direct appeal, contests a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, which reversed the conviction of appellee and granted a new trial. See Cappetta v. State, 204 So. 2d 913 (4th DCA Fla.1968). Appellee alleged for the first time on appeal that fundamental error had been committed by the trial court regarding his right to waive counsel and singlehandedly conduct his own defense. The District Court upheld appellee’s int…
-
Williams v. State, 427 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)…16 So. 2d 749 (Fla.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 1008, 89 S.Ct. 1610, 22 L.Ed.2d 787 (1969). However, self-representation is not an absolute right and need not be allowed [*771] when it would jeopardize a fair trial on the issues. Cappetta v. State, 204 So. 2d 913 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967), rev’d in part, 216 So. 2d 749 (Fla.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 1008, 89 S.Ct. 1610, 22 L.Ed.2d 787 (1969). Therefore, when a defendant attempts to exercise his right to represent himself either by making an unequivocal demand…
Previewing 3 of 29 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Wright v. State, 182 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)
- Solomon v. State, 145 So. 2d 492 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)