OWENS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• United States v. Mears, 614 F.2d 1175 (8th Cir. 1980)
  …the purchase and delivery of the vehicles. We therefore consider the in-court identification by Romines, based on his independent recollection of the defendant, reliable. See, e. g., Starkey v. Wyrick, 555 F. 2d 1352, 1354 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 848, 98 S.Ct. 156, 54 L.Ed.2d 116 (1977). [*1178] Moreover, Romines’ identification of Mears was corroborated by the testimony of several other witnesses who did not view the photographic display, but identified Mears at trial as the purchaser of the ca…
• United States v. Lawrence, 605 F.2d 1321 (4th Cir. 1979)
  …sen,” United States v. Denno, 348 F. 2d 12, 16 (2 Cir. 1965); the request is timely if made “within a reasonable time prior to the commencement of trial,” People v. Windham, 19 Cal.3d 121, 137 Cal.Rptr. 8, 12, 560 P. 2d 1187, 1191 (1977), cert. den. 434 U.S. 848, 98 S.Ct. 157, 54 L.Ed.2d 116 (1977); but see, United States v. Price, 474 F. 2d 1223, 1227 (9 Cir. 1973), where the request was held to be timely when made “before the jury was sworn.”…
• United States v. LEE, 786 F.2d 951 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …ce, parallel but distinct. [*959] Watkins, 721 F. 2d at 690. Nevertheless, no valid purpose can be served by regulation which results in unjustified, disparate treatment. See United States v. Walker, 552 F. 2d 566, 567 n. 3 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 848, 98 S.Ct. 157, 54 L.Ed.2d 116 (1977). Here, the Air Force argues there is no basis for the district court’s assumption that military offenders are likely to escape criminal prosecution. Because the Air Force is unwilling to routinely supply informat…