STOLARZ

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (95 total)

• Webb v. State, 426 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)
  …with his testimony, and was given under oath subject to the penalty of perjury at trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or in a deposition .... [*1035] Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(1)(A). . United States v. Mosley, 555 F. 2d 191 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 851, 98 S.Ct. 163, 54 L.Ed.2d 120 (1977); United States v. Blitz, 533 F. 2d 1329 (2d Cir.1976); United States v. Castro-Ayon, 537 F. 2d 1055 (9th Cir.1976). . The legislative history of Rule 801 clearly establishes that statements made before a grand j…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Moore v. State, 452 So. 2d 559 (Fla. 1984)
  …States v. Coran, 589 F. 2d 70 (1st Cir.1978); United States v. Champion International Corp., 557 F. 2d 1270 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 938, 98 S.Ct. 428, 54 L.Ed.2d 298 (1977); United States v. Mosley, 555 F. 2d 191 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 851, 98 S.Ct. 163, 54 L.Ed.2d 120 (1977). We therefore hold that under section 90.801(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1981), the prior inconsistent statement of a witness at a criminal trial, if given under oath before a grand jury, is excluded from the defin…
• Diamond v. State, 436 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …iamond may then introduce the sworn statement,2 which is “[ijnconsistent with [that] testimony,” under Sec. 90.-801(2)(a). See, United States v. Coran, 589 F. 2d 70 (1st Cir.1978); United States v. Mosley, 555 F. 2d 191 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 851, 98 S.Ct. 163, 54 L.Ed.2d 120 (1977); United States v. Jordano, 521 F. 2d 695 (2d Cir.1975). For this reason, the judgment below is reversed for a new trial to be conducted in accordance with this opinion. Reversed. . The prosecutor stated that h…