WINGARD

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• United States v. Goss, 650 F.2d 1336 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …e admission of summaries of voluminous documentary evidence that cannot be conveniently examined in court, Fed.R.Evid. 1006, United States v. Gorel, 622 F. 2d 100, 106 (5th Cir. 1979); United States v. Smyth, 556 F. 2d 1179 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 862, 98 S.Ct. 190, 54 L.Ed.2d 135 (1977), there is no provision for the admission of summaries of the testimony of out-of-court witnesses. Thus, the agent’s testimony as to his belief that the checks were mailed was improperly admitted and we do not re…
• United States v. Nunziato Fusaro, 708 F.2d 17 (1st Cir. 1983)
  …alluded to too quickly. Saccone cannot and does not argue, however, that the instruction failed to communicate to the jury the substance of his defense. See United States v. Coast of Maine Lobster, Inc., 557 F. 2d 905, 909 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 862, 98 S.Ct. 191, 54 L.Ed.2d [*23] 136 (1977). We find no plain error in the instruction. IV We now consider Fusaro’s remaining objections. First, Fusaro objects to the sufficiency of the indictment. Fusaro argues that because intent to injure or def…
• United States v. Gjon N. Nivica, 887 F.2d 1110 (1st Cir. 1989)
  …d, 393 U.S. 1036, 89 S.Ct. 654, 21 L.Ed.2d 581 (1969). Bearing in mind that judges need not parrot the precise wording of a defendant’s proffered instructions, United States v. Coast of Maine Lobster Co., 557 F. 2d 905, 909 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 862, 98 S.Ct. 191, 54 L.Ed.2d 136 (1977), we perceive no error in the district court’s handling of the good faith issue. We have set forth the pertinent portions of the court’s instructions in the margin.10 The charge plainly communicated the substance…