MATA

v.

AARON, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (49 total)

• In re McDONALD, 489 U.S. 180 (U.S. 1989)
  …ict Court, 444 U. S. 900 (1979); McDonald v. Birch, 444 U. S. 875 (1979); McDonald v. United States District Court and McDonald v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc., 444 U. S. 875 (1979); McDonald v. Thompson, 436 U. S. 911 (1978); McDonald v. Tennessee, 434 U. S. 866 (1977); McDonald v. Davidson County Election Comm’n, 431 U. S. 958 (1977); McDonald v. Tennessee, 431 U. S. 933 (1977); McDonald v. Tennessee, 429 U. S. 1064 (1977); McDonald v. Tennessee, 425 U. S. 955 (1976); McDonald v. Tennessee, 423 U. S. 991 (…
• United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120 (1st Cir. 1981)
  …vast amounts of testimony pertinent to other defendants, but not to them, is sufficient, “either separately or in combination, to render denial of severance an abuse of discretion.” United States v. Smolar, 557 F. 2d 13, 21 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 866, 966, 971, 98 S.Ct. 203, 508, 523, 54 L.Ed.2d 143, 453, 461 (1977). The Seventh Circuit, in a case cited by Goldenberg, has stated that a defendant is not entitled to a separate trial only because it would provide him or her with a better chance of…
• United States v. Webster, 750 F.2d 307 (5th Cir. 1984)
  …rial. Therefore, we find no error in the district court’s refusal to declare a mistrial. See, e.g., United States v. Uptain, 552 F. 2d 1107, 1108 (5th Cir.) (judges’ limiting instructions cured effects of extrinsic offense testimony), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 866, 98 S.Ct. 202, 54 L.Ed.2d 142 (1977). V. JURY MISCONDUCT. The evidence in this case closed on July 19, 1983, and on that day the Government and four of the defendants presented closing arguments. Arguments of the remaining defendants, along with t…