HENDERSON

v.

MARYLAND

Citator

Cited By

• Floyd v. The Honorable E. Randolph Bentley, 496 So. 2d 862 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)
  …t to a jury trial in criminal contempt proceedings when the potential punishment has been limited to no more than six months. Bloom v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 194, 88 S.Ct. 1477, 20 L.Ed.2d 522 (1968); Aaron v. State, 345 So. 2d 641 (Fla.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 868, 98 S.Ct. 208, 54 L.Ed.2d 146 (1977) (Aaron II); Aaron v. State, 284 So. 2d 673 (Fla.1973) (Aaron I); Martinez v. State, 339 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 346 So. 2d 68 (Fla.1977). Since the trial court has entered a “notice to restr…
• Whirley v. State, 450 So. 2d 836 (Fla. 1984)
  …e charge under consideration. We hold that the federal petty crime exception to the jury trial requirement in criminal prosecutions is also an exception under our own constitutional provision. See Aaron v. State, 345 So. 2d 641 (Fla.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 868, 98 S.Ct. 208, 54 L.Ed.2d 146 (1977); Aaron v. State, 284 So. 2d 673 (Fla.1973). The only arguable statutory right to a jury trial for what we find to be a petty offense is under section 932.61, Florida Statutes (1979), which provides: A person ch…
• Attwood v. State, 687 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
  …9, 89 S.Ct. 1503, 1505-06, 23 L.Ed.2d 162 (1969). The Court has applied that distinction in criminal contempt cases. Bloom v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 194, 88 S.Ct. 1477, 20 L.Ed.2d 522 (1968). In Aaron v. State, 345 So. 2d 641, 643 (Fla.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 868, 98 S.Ct. 208, 54 L.Ed.2d 146 (1977), the defendant argued, after being given a four month sentence for criminal contempt, that he was entitled to a jury trial in Florida; however, the Florida Supreme Court rejected his argument and adopted the six…