PRATT

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Grant v. State, 464 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)
  …tly advised of the charge so as to accord him reasonable opportunity to meet the charges by way of defense or explanation.” Id. at 617-618. See also Aaron v. State, 284 So. 2d 673 (Fla.1973), appeal after remand, 345 So. 2d 641 (Fla.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 868, 98 S.Ct. 208, 54 L.Ed.2d 146 (1977) (the right of persons accused of criminal contempt to know, before trial, the specific nature and detail of offenses with which they are charged is a basic right guaranteed by federal and state constitutions); Na…
• United States v. Pelton, 578 F.2d 701 (8th Cir. 1978)
  …k on the District Court’s refusal to order pretrial discovery of witnesses is wholly lacking in merit. Discovery of prospective witnesses is not required under Fed.R.Crim.P. 16(a), United States v. Krohn, 558 F. 2d 390, 394 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 868, 98 S.Ct. 207, 54 L.Ed.2d 145 (1977); United States v. Rogers, 549 F. 2d 490, 494 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918, 97 S.Ct. 2182, 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977), and we can find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s refusal to order this pr…
• United States v. Wayne Scaife (83-5666), 749 F.2d 338 (6th Cir. 1984)
  …ninety day limit been exceeded, Vessells’ remedy would have been release rather than dismissal of the indictment. See United States v. Gaines, 563 F. 2d 1352, 1357 (9th Cir.1977); United States v. Krohn, 558 F. 2d 390, 393 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 868, 98 S.Ct. 207, 54 L.Ed.2d 145 (1977); United States v. Tirasso, 532 F. 2d 1298, 1299-1300 (9th Cir.1976).4 A second issue involves the defendants’ respective pretrial motions for severance [*344] under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 14. Vessell…