DE MARO ET UX.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (77 total)

• Marshall v. State, 473 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
  …e’s argument that the prosecutor’s remarks amounted to nothing more than a comment on “the evidence as it existed before the jury.” Cases like this fall under the rubric announced in United States v. Bubar, 567 F. 2d 192 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872, 98 S.Ct. 217, 54 L.Ed.2d 151 (1977): “A constitutional violation occurs ... if either the defendant alone has the information to contradict the government evidence referred to or the jury ‘naturally and necessarily’ would interpret the summation as…
• Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (U.S. 1980)
  …le Criminal Defendants: Conflicts of Interest and the Professional Responsibilities of the Defense Attorney, 62 Minn. L. Rev. 119, 152-157 (1978); Lowenthal, supra, at 961-963. See United States v. Kidding, 560 F. 2d 1303, 1310 (CA7), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 872 (1977); United States v. Mandell, 525 F. 2d 671, 675-677 (CA7 1975), cert. denied, 423 U. S. 1049 (1976); Geer, supra n. 11, at 145-146. Cf. United States v. Medel, 592 F. 2d 1305, 1312-1313 (CA5 1979); Foxworth v. Wainwright, 516 F. 2d 1072, 1076-…
• United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121 (2d Cir. 1979)
  …ttorneys to explain the sources of the income constituted impermissible comment on defendants’ failure to testify, in violation of their privilege to refrain from so testifying. In United States v. Bubar, 567 F. 2d 192, 199 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872, 98 S.Ct. 217, 54 L.Ed.2d 151 (1977), a case in which the prosecutor commented upon the defendants’ failure to explain Government evidence, the court held that “the substance of the prosecutor’s comments [did not] violate appellant’s constitutional…