MITCHELL, WARDEN

v.

HEALEY

Citator

Cited By (52 total)

• Sells v. CSX Transp., Inc., 170 So. 3d 27 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)
  …in the railroad system. See S. Pac. Transp. Co. v. Usery, 539 F. 2d 386, 389-91 (5th Cir.1976) (discussing that the FRA does not have an “industry-wide exemption” that would render OSHA regulations preempted in the railroad workplace), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 874 (1977). Courts have held that where the FRA does not preempt OSHA, OSHA regulations are admissible as general evidence of a railway’s negligence. See Ries v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp., 960 F. 2d 1156, 1165 (3rd Cir.1992). In turn, OSHA regulatio…
• La. Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 476 U.S. 355 (U.S. 1986)
  …fected by the state regulation which the FCC would seek to pre-empt. E. g., North Carolina Utilities Comm’n v. FCC, 537 F. 2d 787 (CA4), cert. denied, 429 U. S. 1027 (1976); North Carolina Utilities Comm’n v. FCC, 552 F. 2d 1036 (CA4), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 874 (1977); Puerto Rico Telephone Co. v. FCC, 553 F. 2d 694 (CA1 1977); New York Telephone Co. v. FCC, 631 F. 2d 1059 (CA2 1980). The short answer to this argument is that it misrepresents the statutory scheme and the basis and test for pre-emption. Wh…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Decoster, 624 F.2d 196 (D.C. Cir. 1976)
  …lvarez, 580 F. 2d 1251, 1254-1255 (5th Cir. 1978); Collingsworth v. Mayo, 173 F. 2d 695, 697 (5th Cir. 1949); Wilson v. Cowan, 578 F. 2d 166, 168 (6th Cir. 1978); United States ex rel. Healey v. Cannon, 553 F. 2d 1052, 1057 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 874, 98 S.Ct. 221, 54 L.Ed.2d 153 (1977); United States ex rel. Feeley v. Ragen, 166 F. 2d 976, 980-981 (7th Cir. 1948); Beran v. United States, 580 F. 2d 324, 326 (8th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 946, 99 S.Ct. 1422, 59 L.Ed.2d 634 (1979); Taylor…