HAIM

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Mancillas, 580 F.2d 1301 (7th Cir. 1978)
  …priate instruction would have been refused if demanded. At the very least, we decline to allow this tactical choice to increase appellants’ chances for reversal on appeal. See United States v. Krohn, 560 F. 2d 293, 297 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 895, 98 S.Ct. 275, 54 L.Ed.2d 182 (1977); cf. Fed.R. Crim.P. 30. The narrow question, then, is whether the danger that the jury would take the hearsay statement of Rodriguez as proof that a heroin deal was the purpose of the Joliet trip, had any reason…
• United States v. Beasley, 809 F.2d 1273 (7th Cir. 1987)
  …identity, or sometimes the extent and membership of a conspiracy, is the usual one in this circuit, as in others. E.g., United States v. Grabiec, 563 F. 2d 313, 318 (7th Cir.1977); United States v. Krohn, 560 F. 2d 293, 296 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 895, 98 S.Ct. 275, 54 L.Ed.2d 182 (1977); United States v. McCord, 509 F. 2d 891, 895 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 833, 96 S.Ct. 56, 46 L.Ed.2d 51 (1975). When the similarity of the acts is used to identify the culprit, the proximity of the acts…
• United States v. Moore, 580 F.2d 360 (9th Cir. 1978)
  …the time and seemed content with the manner in which the court chose to handle the problem. The facts are akin in many respects to those which the Seventh Circuit confronted in United States v. Krohn, 7 Cir., 1977, 560 F. 2d 293, cert. denied, 1977, 434 U.S. 895, 98 S.Ct. 275, 54 L.Ed.2d 182. There, as here, the defense caught a juror napping but took no action until the appropriate moment for inquiry had passed. The court said: [*365] The only conclusion possible from this record is that defense counsel, f…