ROME ET UX., TRUSTEES

v.

INDIAN HEAD, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (32 total)

• United States v. Twigg, 588 F.2d 373 (3d Cir. 1978)
  …g the defendants, the jury rejected the entrapment defense. On appeal, we must inquire: viewing the evidence most favorable to, the Government, could a jury find predisposition? United States v. Townsend, 555 F. 2d 152, 156 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 897, 98 S.Ct. 277, 54 L.Ed.2d 184 (1977); see Tzimopoulos v. United States, 554 F. 2d 1216 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 851, 98 S.Ct. 164, 54 L.Ed.2d 120 (1977); United States v. Gurule, 522 F. 2d 20, 23 (10th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 97…
• Broad v. Rockwell Int'l Corp., 642 F.2d 929 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …holders of debentures because “the debenture holders have never had an absolute right [under the indenture] to convert into [the issuer’s] stock in a merger”), aff’d mem. sub nom. Brucker v. Indian Head, Inc., 559 F. 2d 1202 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 897, 98 S.Ct. 277, 54 L.Ed.2d 183 (1977).25 Cf. Broenen v. Beaunit Corp., 440 F. 2d 1244, 1248-49 (7th Cir. 1970) (under New York law, provision virtually identical to Section 4.11 of the Indenture mandated that holders of convertible debentures receive…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. McLERNON, 746 F.2d 1098 (6th Cir. 1984)
  …cement or persuasion; and the nature of the inducement or persuasion supplied by the Government. Kaminski, 703 F. 2d at 1008 (quoting Reynoso-Ulloa, 548 at 1336); See also United States v. Townsend, 555 F. 2d 152, 155 n. 3 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 897, 98 S.Ct. 277, 54 L.Ed.2d 184 (1977). In considering those factors, we find initially that the government presented no evidence of the character or reputation of Yaqui, including any prior criminal record, from which a reasonable juror could have f…