ROBINSON
v.
UNITED STATES
ROBINSON
UNITED STATES
434 U.S. 905
Supreme Court of the United States (1977)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Loyd v. Loyd, 731 F.2d 393 (7th Cir. 1984)…rsonal representatives are acting in a private capacity and not as functionaries of the state. Another analogous case involving a fiduciary, a trustee of a community land grant, was Mondragon v. Tenorio, 554 F. 2d 423 (10th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 905, 98 S.Ct. 305, 54 L.Ed.2d 193. Although the state courts had described the trustees in some opinions as being “quasi-municipal corporations” and even though some of their actions had to be approved by a state court judge, the federal court- held the…
-
The Valley Nat'l Bank v. Porter, 705 F.2d 1027 (8th Cir. 1983)…ith, Inc., 296 Minn. 130, 207 N.W. 2d 282, 287 (Minn.1973). Mere negligence or knowledge of suspicious circumstances is not sufficient to show bad faith. See id.; McCook County National Bank v. Compton, 558 F. 2d 871, 876 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 905, 98 S.Ct. 302, 54 L.Ed.2d 191 (1977); see also Hess v. Iowa Banker’s Mortgage Co., 198 Iowa 1365, 201 N.W. 91, 92 (Iowa 1924). The definition of notice pertinent to the instant case is that a person has notice of a claim if “from all the facts and…
-
United States v. Hibernia Nat'l Bank, 841 F.2d 592 (5th Cir. 1988)…e ordinary care when, presented with a check containing conflicting figures, it failed to contact the payor to ascertain the correct amount before negotiating the check. McCook County National Bank v. Compton, 558 F. 2d 871 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 905, 98 S.Ct. 302, 54 L.Ed.2d 191 (1977). 7) Hibernia breached its duty to exercise ordinary care by failing to inform the Federal Reserve Bank concerning the discrepancy on the face of the check. 8) Hibernia further breached its duty to exercise ordi…