MADONNA

v.

UNITED STATES; AND LARCA V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• ST. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Barry, 438 U.S. 531 (U.S. 1978)
  …ity would have no immunity.” Id., at 9. On August 12, 1977, petitioners sought a writ of certiorari in this Court. To resolve the conflicting interpretations of § 3 (b) adopted by several Courts of Appeals,5 we granted the writ on October 31, 1977. 434 U. S. 919. We now affirm. [*537] II At the threshold, we confront a question of mootness. Although not raised by the parties, this issue implicates our jurisdiction. See, e. g., Memphis Light, Gas & Water Div. v. Craft, 436 U. S. 1, 7-8 (1978); Sosna v. Iowa…
• Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340 (U.S. 1978)
  …fs’ case, they were required to perform it and thus to bear its cost. See 552 F. 2d, at 1102-1103. [*349] We granted certiorari in the instant case to resolve the conflict that thus has arisen and to consider the underlying cost-allocation problems. 434 U. S. 919 (1977). II The issues in this case arise because of the notice requirement of Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 23(c)(2), which provides in part: “In any class action maintained under subdivision (b) (3), the court shall direct to the members of the class the…
• Hicklin v. Orbeck, 437 U.S. 518 (U.S. 1978)
  …2, however, the court held that the Act’s general preference for Alaska residents was constitutionally permissible. Appellants appealed the State Supreme Court’s judgment insofar as it embodied the latter holding, and we noted probable jurisdiction. 434 U. S. 919 (1977). We reverse. [*523] II Preliminarily, we hold that this case is not moot. Despite the Alaska Supreme Court’s invalidation of the one-year durational residency requirement, a controversy still exists between at least five of the appellants- —…