LAW
v.
ALABAMA
LAW
ALABAMA
434 U.S. 919
Supreme Court of the United States (1977)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Constr. Aggregates Corp. v. de Vicenty, 573 F.2d 86 (1st Cir. 1978)…tention upheld the refusal of the district court to adjudicate a fraud claim arising out of Rhode Island’s insurance premium ratemaking system. Barry v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 555 F. 2d 3, 12-13 (1st Cir.), cert. granted on other: grounds, 434 U.S. 919, 98 S.Ct. 391, 54 L.Ed.2d 275 (1977). This court noted the drastic consequences of abstention as a defeat of the purposes underlying the grant of diversity jurisdiction, but felt that judicial economy and protection from disruption of important sta…
-
N. Jonas & Co., Inc. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 666 F.2d 829 (3d Cir. 1981)…merican Dredging Company v. Selleck, 556 F. 2d 180 (3d Cir. 1977). Extreme situations where an affirmative act of misconduct inflicts grave injustice on the claimant may warrant estoppel. See Rucker v. Saxbe, 552 F. 2d 998 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 919, 98 S.Ct. 392, 54 L.Ed.2d 275 (1977); see generally, Moser v. United States, 341 U.S. 41, 47, 71 S.Ct. 553, 556, 95 L.Ed. 729 (1951). That is not the case here, for we find no misbehavior by EPA: the Agency did not engage in a discriminatory perse…