SALYER

v.

ILLINOIS

Citator

Cited By (22 total)

• United States v. Rios, 611 F.2d 1335 (10th Cir. 1979)
  …references to threats or danger to prosecution witnesses are improper unless admissible testimony is offered connecting the defendant with the threats or danger. See, e. g., United States v. Mitchell, 556 F. 2d 371, 379-80 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 925, 98 S.Ct. 406, 54 L.Ed.2d 284; United States v. Davis, 487 F. 2d 112, 125-26 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 981, 94 S.Ct. 1573, 39 L.Ed.2d 878. Even evidence showing that the witness is in protective custody may be prejudicial to the defendant.…
• United States v. Gleason, 616 F.2d 2 (2d Cir. 1979)
  …over, where such proof, though of some relevance, may lead to confusing and time-consuming disputes with respect to collateral issues the trial judge may properly reject or limit it. United States v. King, 560 F. 2d 122, 134 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 925, 98 S.Ct. 404, 54 L.Ed.2d 283 (1977); Fed.R.Evid. 403. This appears to have been the situation confronting the district court in this case. Even with respect to the September 20, 1973, transfer of securities, serious collateral issues were raised r…
• United States v. Williams, 577 F.2d 188 (2d Cir. 1978)
  …eply was not forthcoming, we hold that the conversation constituted an adoptive admission within the circumscribed purview of Rule 801(d)(2)(B). See United States v. Flecha, supra; United States v. King, 560 F. 2d 122, 134 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 925, 98 S.Ct. 404, 54 L.Ed.2d 283 (1977). We have carefully considered all of appellant’s contentions and find them to be without merit. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. . Appellant’s prior trial, also before Judge Goettel, resulted in a hung j…