SHEFFEY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170 (9th Cir. 1979)
  …in his favor without laying himself open to a cross-examination upon those facts’.” Brown v. United States, 356 U.S. 148, 155, 78 S.Ct. 622, 626, 2 L.Ed.2d 589 (1958). See also United States v. Lustig, 555 F. 2d 737, 750 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 926, 98 S.Ct. 408, 54 L.Ed.2d 285 (1977). Just as a “defendant who takes the stand in his own behalf cannot then claim the [Fifth Amendment] privilege against cross-examination on matters reasonably related to the subject matter of his direct examinat…
• United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869 (9th Cir. 1980)
  …prescribed bounds is a limited one, see Dorzynski v. United States, 418 U.S. 424, 94 S.Ct. 3042, 41 L.Ed.2d 855 (1974); United States v. Stevenson, 573 F. 2d 1105 (9th Cir. 1978); United States v. Lustig, 555 F. 2d 737, 751 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 926, 98 S.Ct. 408, 54 L.Ed.2d 285 (1977), we have held that a sentence must be vacated on appeal if the district court uses information which is “(1) false or unreliable, and (2) demonstrably made the basis for the sentence.” Farrow v. United States, 58…
• United States v. James A. Whitley (83-5428), 734 F.2d 1129 (6th Cir. 1984)
  …fication is neither irrational nor unreasonable. This classification is proper for the stated Congressional purposes regardless of cocaine’s proper pharmacological classification. United States v. Lustig, 555 F. 2d 737, 750 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 926, 98 S.Ct. 408, 54 L.Ed.2d 285 (1977); United States v. Harper, 530 F. 2d 828 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 820, 97 S.Ct. 66, 50 L.Ed.2d 80 (1976). In the instant case, the government established by expert testimony that the substance retrieved…