BERRY ET AL., JUDGES

v.

JUDICIARY COMMISSION OF LOUISIANA

Citator

Cited By (75 total)

• Davis v. State, 562 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
  …2d 1109, 1124 & n. 4 (8th Cir.) (The court referred to the business records exception then contained in the Federal Business Records Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1732(a) (1970); that exception is now contained in Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6).), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940, 98 S.Ct. 432, 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977); see also United States v. Parker, 491 F. 2d 517, 520-21 (8th Cir.1973). Here, the St. Louis Police Department Laboratory made these reports in the ordinary course of its business and kept the records under its c…
• Glimmert Beckham v. State, 397 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …er to order that the new trial actually be conducted or, indeed, directly to require any action whatever by the lower court. See Pierre v. United States, 525 F. 2d 933 (5th Cir. 1976); Wallace v. Havener, 552 F. 2d 721 (6th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940, 98 S.Ct. 433, 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (S.Ct.1977); Dixon v. Beto, 472 F. 2d 598 (5th Cir. 1973); Anderson v. Beto, 469 F. 2d 1076 (5th Cir. 1972). It is therefore clear that the Florida case was not itself reopened, a new trial was not “ma[de] possible,”…
• In re the Complaint of William McLINN v. The F/V Fjord, 739 F.2d 1395 (9th Cir. 1984)
  …1108 (9th Cir.1976). When the trial courts are called upon to resolve questions of foreign law, we also review their conclusions under the de novo standard. Fed.R.Civ.P. 44.1. See also Kalmich v. Bruno, 553 F. 2d 549, 552 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940, 98 S.Ct. 432, 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977); 9 C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure § 2446 (1971). There is no sound reason why we have a lesser appellate duty to the parties to make a correct, independent determination when the question i…