JACKSON

v.

JAGO, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT

Citator

Cited By (36 total)

• Glimmert Beckham v. State, 397 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …er to order that the new trial actually be conducted or, indeed, directly to require any action whatever by the lower court. See Pierre v. United States, 525 F. 2d 933 (5th Cir. 1976); Wallace v. Havener, 552 F. 2d 721 (6th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940, 98 S.Ct. 433, 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (S.Ct.1977); Dixon v. Beto, 472 F. 2d 598 (5th Cir. 1973); Anderson v. Beto, 469 F. 2d 1076 (5th Cir. 1972). It is therefore clear that the Florida case was not itself reopened, a new trial was not “ma[de] possible,”…
• United States v. Rios, 611 F.2d 1335 (10th Cir. 1979)
  …vid. 801(d)(1)(B). Under this rule, it is unnecessary for a witness’ consistent statements to have been made prior to the statements which have been used to impeach him. See United States v. Scholle, 553 F. 2d 1109, 1121-22 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940, 98 S.Ct. 432, 54 L.Ed.2d 300. The district court did not abuse its discretion in permitting the jury to hear both the consistent and inconsistent statements in order to facilitate their evaluation of the Vega brothers’ credibility. See also United…
• United States v. Evans, 697 F.2d 240 (8th Cir. 1983)